UPDATE: Transportation writer Jon Hilkevitch (“Hilkie”) published an article today about crosswalk enforcement in Chicago based on a new state law the Active Transportation Alliance helped pass that removes ambiguity about what drivers must do when a person wants to cross the street (they must STOP).

But I’m updating this post because he also writes about the crazy pedestrian situation I describe below at Adams and Riverside. I’ve quoted the key parts here:

The situation can be even worse downtown, where a vehicles-versus-pedestrians culture seems to flourish unchecked. Simply walking across Adams Street outside Chicago Union Station at rush hour can feel like you’re taking a big risk, as pedestrians dodge cars, buses and cabs and then must maneuver around the panhandlers and assorted vendors clogging the sidewalks near the curb.

It’s a mystery why such mayhem is tolerated by city or Amtrak police. The highest volume of pedestrian traffic downtown is right there at Adams and the Chicago River outside the station, according to a study conducted for the city.

“The cabdrivers have no concern with pedestrians trying to cross Adams in the crosswalk,” said Richard Sakowski, who commutes downtown daily on Metra from his home in Oswego. “They cut in front of other drivers cursing and yelling, pull from the center lane to the curb and stop in the crosswalk, not caring who they might hit. It is a very dangerous situation that the city does not care about.”

Chicago officials disagree, yet they have for years studied the problems around the downtown commuter rail stations without taking major action.

The city has received more than $10 million in grants to develop an off-street terminal on the south side of Jackson Boulevard just south of Union Station to address traffic safety issues and the crush of taxis and buses vying for limited curb space, according to the Chicago Department of Transportation.

“No timetable yet, but construction could begin in the next few years,” CDOT spokesman Brian Steele said.

Read the full article.


Every weekday afternoon in Chicago, over 100,000 people need to get to Union Station and Ogilvie Transportation Center to get on their Metra trains and go home. If you’re watching them walk, it seems like they don’t have enough room. The multitude of private automobiles with a single occupant and the hundreds of taxicabs also traveling towards these train terminals block the tens of buses that are trying to get commuters to the stations or to their neighborhoods.

Let’s look at Adams Street between Wacker Drive and Riverside Plaza. Riverside Plaza is a pedestrian-only thoroughfare (privately owned) alongside the west bank of the Chicago River and connects both train stations.

Flickr Tag Error: Call to display photo '4826014238[small]' failed.

Error state follows:

  • stat: fail
  • code: 1
  • message: Photo not found

People “wait” to cross to the south sidewalk on Adams Street at Wacker Drive because they want to get to the entrance of Union Station. I use wait lightly – they creep out into the street and jog across whenever there’s the slightest opening (against the crosswalk signal).

Flickr Tag Error: Call to display photo '4826016154[small]' failed.

Error state follows:

  • stat: fail
  • code: 1
  • message: Photo not found

Those who didn’t cross Adams Street at Wacker Drive now have to cross at Riverside Plaza. Thankfully, there’s a timed signal here for the crosswalk that stops traffic on Adams Street. It doesn’t always work because taxi drivers park their cabs on all segments of Adams Street here, sometimes on top of the crosswalk stripes themselves.

Take a look at the data (from the City of Chicago Traffic Information website):

  • 41,700 pedestrians, walking in both directions, were counted on Adams Street immediately west of Wacker Drive in one 10 hour segment, between 7:45 and 17:45, in 2007.
  • 14,300 vehicles, westbound only, were counted on Adams Street immediately east of Wacker Drive in one 24 hour segment, on September 20, 2006.

For simplicity, divide the number of pedestrians in half to get the actual number of people walking toward the train station in the afternoon. 20,850 commuters walk on Adams Street to get to Union Station. But trains don’t stop at 17:45. There are several more leaving every 5-10 minutes until 19:00. So add a couple more thousand pedestrians. Imagine that a couple hundred of them will be walking in the street because the sidewalk is crammed (I haven’t photographed this yet).

Now for vehicles. We don’t know how many are delivery trucks, taxicabs, or buses were counted. Only two bus routes come through here. (On Madison Street, in front of the Ogilvie Transportation Center, there are twelve bus routes and fewer walkers.) Some of the vehicles are turning right or left onto Wacker, so we can probably decrease the quantity that’s actually passing by the same count location as the pedestrian count.

Spatial mismatch

So now we know a little bit more about how many people, and by what mode, travel on Adams Street between Wacker Drive and Riverside Plaza. Walking commuters have little room (so little that some choose to walk in the street) on their standard 10-14 feet wide sidewalks and motorized vehicles get lots of room in four travel lanes. Then, the vehicles that achieve the highest efficiency and economic productivity are delayed by the congestion, in part caused by the least efficient vehicles.

Is the space divided fairly? What should change? What examples of “transportation spatial mismatch” can you give for where you live?

Flickr Tag Error: Call to display photo '3998513210[small]' failed.

Error state follows:

  • stat: fail
  • code: 1
  • message: Photo not found

Is Chicago ready for Tokyo-inspired elevated pedestrian bridges at intersections? Las Vegas has several of these, as well as every Asian city with a few million residents. I first brought this up in the post, World photographic tour. Photo by Yuzi Kanazawa.

  • Jennifer

    Perhaps a double-decker bridge on Adams, with the lower deck being peds-only, and then a ramp leading down above the trainyard directly into the bowels of Union Station? Or even better, funnel the motor vehicles down to the lower deck, but that would necessitate a signaled intersection with Lower Wacker or something. CDOT would not be thrilled.

    Or just take a lane or two out of Adams, but that doesn’t solve the crosswalk problem.

    Would it be possible to build more entrances to Union Station in more of the buildings in the vicinity?

    Maybe… raise the grade of Adams, double-decker bridge with the top deck for motor vehicles and the bottom deck (current street level) for peds, all the way from Upper Wacker to Clinton, with a fanciful system of ramps for motor traffic on and off Canal…

    • http://www.stevevance.net/planning Steven Vance

      Now you’re talking ;)

      What about…building a tunnel at Adams and Franklin, where the slope from Franklin to Wacker begins. The tunnel would then rise where there’s no slope under Wacker and meet the bridge at a height tall enough to still allow the river cruise boats.

      Maybe even a moving walkway?

      • Jennifer

        Eh, it was lunch and I was bored. I’m often inspired by all the double- and triple-decker streets we already have. Lower Wacker was built pretty much for aesthetics only, to send all the delivery trucks underground, was it not?

  • Aaron Brown

    Steve,

    It’s an important question, but I think you (and Jennifer) and being over-complicated with your suggested solutions. Raised crosswalks or separated bridges seem like bad ideas, since they force pedestrians off the ground level, deadening the streetscape. More importantly, they send a message that the street is only for cars, and pedestrians must be kept away.

    I think the solution is simple. Given that there are so many more pedestrians and transit-riders here, take away a lane (or more) of traffic and use it for dedicated bus lanes, expanded sidewalks, and bike lanes. This would both benefit the biggest (and most efficient) users of the space, but also encourage more non-car use of the street.

    • http://www.stevevance.net/planning Steven Vance

      The last photo, showing pedestrian bridges over a pretty normal streetscape was my decent attempt at some humor. We have too much frustration!

  • Pingback: brain tumor symptoms in women

  • Pingback: French Montana mixtapes

  • Pingback: personal injury

  • Pingback: clairvoyants

  • Pingback: auckland drainlayer