You’ve never seen anything cuter than this.
Blue is a Yuba Mundo, v3
Pink is a DeFietsfabriek (now defunct) omafiets.
The park is Palmisano.
Writing about cities
You’ve never seen anything cuter than this.
Blue is a Yuba Mundo, v3
Pink is a DeFietsfabriek (now defunct) omafiets.
The park is Palmisano.
Read more commentary on LEED certification.
If a building claims it has environmentally friendly features (is that the same as eco-friendly?) but hasn’t applied for and received LEED certification, should we still call it “green”?
I’m talking specifically about Emerald, a two-tower (mid-height) condominium development on Green Street in Chicago’s Greektown/West Loop neighborhood. I watched its construction from beginning to end because I passed it daily on my commute to work.
The development’s sales website claims that because it sits on Green Street, it’s “naturally eco-friendly.” The website says the building has “bamboo flooring, low-VOC paint and beautiful fabrics made from recycled fiber. Even our marketing materials utilize recycled paper manufactured with windpower and printed with soy inks.”
These scaffold panels are advertising office space in a new tower that has since been built on this site. The one on the right reads “Reflect the social conscience of your organization.” Photo by Payton Chung.
Additionally, it has a 4-pipe HVAC system versus an “inferior” 2-pipe system, and high efficiency windows.
But I looked in the U.S. Green Building Council’s (USGBC) Certified Project Directory and didn’t find a project named “Emerald.” Let’s assume my search and the results are correct and Emerald does NOT have LEED certification. Are the claims on the website accurate? How can we trust that the paint truly has less volatile organic compounds?
If it was LEED certified would we trust it more then?
The building advertised in the photo above, 300 N LaSalle, received two certifications: Silver in Commercial Interior, and Gold in Core & Shell. The advertisement’s claims have some verification, but how trustworthy? My photo.
I’m not a LEED AP (Accredited Professional), but I understand that LEED certification requires thorough documentation. After a review of your application and submittals (essentially an audit), the USGBC makes its determination. I don’t believe anyone representing the USGBC inspects the building.
We then have to question why the Emerald developers didn’t seek LEED certification. Or did they?
This post on the removal of car parking at a park inspired me to write this post about the addition of car parking at a park.
Palmisano (Stearns Quarry) Park was created out of a dolomite limestone quarry and landfill in Bridgeport. The park is well designed and has a variety of landscape features. It’s quite popular, especially with elderly Asian residents.
Now, after a year of it being open, many diagonal parking spaces were installed on 27th Street. Space was removed from the parkway to create additional parking spaces where only parallel spaces existed.
Access to the park is not an issue. There are hundreds of households and thousands of residents within half a mile. There’re bike lanes and bus stops. There is a signalized intersection that makes it safer for people to cross the street to the park. Lastly, there are many unused parallel parking spaces lining two sides of the park.
So why was parking added? Did the neighbors ask for it? Did the Chicago Park District feel new parking was needed?
In a nutshell, my complaints against this are:
I would like to see the bumpout “island” transformed into a proper curb extension at a stop sign where drivers typically pause in the crosswalk and quickly turn right into southbound Halsted without stopping. I would like to see a bioswale collect the water from the street at this curb and divert it to the park’s wetlands.
*As I understand it, if parking meter spaces are removed and converted to another use (like a curb extension or on-street bicycle parking), a non-metered space must be converted to the equivalent metered spaces removed.
UPDATE 04-07-11: The station opened on April 3, 2011. Blair Kamin explains why it doesn’t look as good as originally designed:
It didn’t have to be this way. The Chicago office of Skidmore, Owings & Merrill came up with a promising design for the station, one that justified the demolition of a Mies-designed brick hut that reportedly served as the entrance to an underground testing facility for explosives during the Cold War.
But then, things went seriously off the rails.
This new Metra commuter/regional rail station at 35th Street and Wentworth/Federal won’t win any design awards. Neither will the Lovana S. “Lou†Jones/Bronzeville Station stand out for having such a generic design.
The station under construction as of October 3, 2010.
Artist’s renderings of the station and street-level plaza, looking northwest. Left photo from Metra’s website and right photo from Singh & Associates’s website.
The amount of visible concrete used in the stairs and ramps construction (one complete set on either side of the tracks) is fitting if you consider the station’s surroundings: a 12-lane highway (the Dan Ryan, I90/94), thousands of surface auto parking spaces to the west (for the White Sox stadium), and an empty lot.
But what if we looked for design inspiration from the east?
Imagine a station shelter modeled after the sound mitigation “tube” over the Illinois Institute of Technology McCormick-Tribune Campus Center a few blocks away at State Street designed by Rem Koolhaas.
Photos above taken by Steven Crane.
Throw in some curves like the Canary Wharf stations on the Jubilee and Docklands Light Railway lines.
Photo of the Canary Wharf Docklands Light Railway (DLR) station by stephenk1977.
Photo of the Canary Wharf Jubilee Underground Line station by Payton Chung.
Companies involved:
This post will be updated as I receive more information and shoot more photos. Please contribute your own updates and news.
31st Street Beach and harbor construction.
Do you have construction updates for your city or state?