Author: Steven Vance

Transit must integrate with bicycle facilities

Valley Metro, the bus and light rail operator for the Phoenix Metro in Arizona, forgot to install bike parking at the Roosevelt/Central station in downtown Phoenix. This station might have been part of a planned Transit Oriented Development (TOD), or it might not have, but the fact is that there’s plenty of mid-density residential buildings right across the street and further west.

There’s no excuse to NOT have bike parking at ANY light rail or transit station. However, during my visit there on grand opening day (December 27th, 2008), my observations along with the Valley Metro publications indicate that the agency only installed bike parking at stations with park & ride lots.

I believe Valley Metro will realize their error and install secure bike parking at this station – there’s plenty of room!

Valley Metro may actually be motivated to install the bike racks when they realize that cyclists will be locking their bikes to the railings on the inside of the shade structures. These are not ideal locations for bike parking, could be unsafe, and will potentially damage the shade structures. I hope it doesn’t come to that and Valley Metro makes the station upgrades as soon as possible.

Biking in the winter

Frank's bikeHow do you get people to bike in the winter?

  1. You educate about clothing
  2. You make it safe
  3. And you educate some more (but this time about lighting and defensive riding)
  4. Remind them about transit

1. Bikers don’t need technical gear. So many websites talk about clothing on the cheap. I really don’t want to reiterate what they’ve said, but the key points are: wool, layers, windbreaker, wool, layers, and a windbreak. Got it?

2. CLEAR THE ROADS. And then clear the sidewalks so cyclists can get to the bike racks (well, this isn’t that big of an issue if your city chose the right bike rack – U-racks and wave racks stick out above the snow cover – see photo).

3. Since the days are shorter and the darkness lasts longer, lighting is a necessity. Most states require a front headlight (that means a white, battery-powered light and not a reflector, which is worthless). Bicyclists need to know how to ride safe. Every major North American city publishes something about safe cycling in urban settings. Here’s Chicago’s: English | Espanol (both in PDF).

4. Transit is everyone’s winter friend! For those who can’t ride their bike all the way, make sure they have the right materials to connect their short bike ride with a transit ride. It might even eliminate a transfer (and reduce the trip cost). Most transit agencies in North America have bike racks on the front of buses. Check your local transit agency’s website or information center (try headquarters) for a brochure on how to ride the bus – or train – with your bike.

It can be done!

P.S. I cannot stress lighting enough. Motorists appreciate it. It allows them to make more informed decisions about their driving path and speed. It also reduces aggression because they see that the cyclist is doing the right thing.

Sources for urban planning-related articles

What sources do I read for urban planning issues, research and articles?

The New York Times is a great place to begin one’s search for urban planning articles. The Times doesn’t exactly categorize their articles as such, so a search for them must involve a specific city’s name. Architecture will be a topic appearing more often than “urban planning.” It’s great, though, that architecture is often closely related to urban planning, or at the least, urban design.

Other large newspapers around the world (like San Francisco Chronicle, Guardian and Observer and Times in London) serve as venues for authors of urban planning articles. India is a notable place because the amount of growth and wealth in that country is expanding rapidly – this makes for a lot of writable experiences and observations. Out of all the large newspapers, the NYT is by far the best. U.S. cities that have a history of good urban planning (namely Portland and Seattle) have excellent representation of the profession in their mainstream media.

On the web, Planetizen has done the hard work of filtering the thousands of articles from mainstream media and picking out those of interest to the urban planning members of the website. I like the thrice-weekly email updates of new news articles the site editors have selected.

My last source is Streetsblog. This is quite strictly a New York City-only blog but it’s updated more quickly than the local mainstream media about events and happenings that are even closer to home – for example, what’s happening in your own block.

Technorati Tags: , ,

Getting people out of cars

Gas prices are only one of the costs associated with car ownership. It comprises a large part of yearly expenses for one’s automobile, but it only accounts for 20% of the “true cost of ownership.”

Edmunds.com has figured that with a new 2007 Toyota Camry LE with automatic transmission, fuel will cost an average of $1676 per year in Chicago for the next five years. That’s 21.5% of the total amount of money the car’s owner will spend and lose for the next five years.

So why do people continue to let their cars ruin their personal financial stability, regardless of how well they can argue its necessity?

One reason is that people haven’t considered the alternatives or, if considered, believe taking the train or bus, walking, biking, carsharing, or vanpooling won’t work for them. But it obviously works for millions of people everyday. Do they know something we don’t? Do they live a block from the commuter train station at home and work one block away from the end station? Are their legs in better shape than others’?

I think that governmental and non-profit agencies that have the mandate and authority to reduce vehicular traffic, congestion, and ownership, can use better marketing tools that will assist car owners to find ways that make their vehicles less relied upon and less used, period. By having car owners drive less, they will become more financially secure, probably experience reduced emotional and physical stress, and reduce their impact on the earth and the atmosphere.

In return, infrastructure would improve because money for highways and roads would be spent on projects and systems that have a better return on investment; transit agencies are able to serve more people (riders) than can highways serve singular drivers and their vehicles. Simply put, driving is a very selfish act which, combined with millions of other selfish drivers, creates a dysfunctional and inequitable transportation arrangement.

I have one tool in mind that can sway people out of their cars. My idea goes beyond slinging simple to understand quotes and statistics that all fail to motivate (for example, and this is not totally accurate, “80% of all car trips are less than 2 miles from the point of origin.”). What we need are individuals who are passionate about the alternatives to car ownership, those who, themselves have chosen a car-free or reduced-car lifestyle. These people would be used to listen to drivers who express some interest in jettisoning their driving habits or reducing their dependence on cars and determine some personalized options to accomplish this.

It would all start with a website. This website would have two purposes: to inform and to connect. The information on car ownership costs and how to reduce one’s car dependence is already out there – that would just be copied. The connect section of the website would invite visitors to submit their name, and either an email address, IM name, or phone number. One of the passionate individuals I asked for above would contact this person and become familiar with their car routines and suggest small ways to meet the driver’s goals.

Obviously, connections would need to be made on a local scale so helpers can be more effective and knowledgeable about the advice they give.

Getting people out of cars and using alternative modes of transportation almost always starts with one-on-one dialogue. It’s a goal that requires a lot of knowledge and some planning. I’m sure there are many readers who have been able to design a plan for at least a few people they know; sometimes it’s just a personal example that is needed to show how easy the change can be and how beneficial it is for more than themselves.

Technorati Tags: , , , , ,

A simple way to make biking easier

Biking is already super easy. There’s so little investment. And most people’s bikes aren’t even in top or good condition. Bikes will roll for so long before the last piece to break down actually goes ahead and breaks down. You don’t need a license, but you do need some lights. No helmet is required and neither is registration.

Buy a bike and go.

But it’s hard to go uphill, right? Fortunately, Chicago is flat. If you think there are hills, please vacation to Seattle and Portland to see what cyclists there have to deal with. The only hills we have in Chicago are bridges going over the different branches of the river, and a handful of overpasses – and these are mainly to go over railroads because Chicago’s expressways are smartly built below regular ground level.

A couple bike lifts, like this one mentioned and picture on CoolTown Studios, might be just what is needed to get half of a town’s cyclists up and over to the grocery store or music venue on the other side.

Just to quickly inform you how it works: There is a tinny escalator installed on the side of the road, but instead of steps, there are short poles. Stand over your bike with one foot on the pedal and the opposite foot on the end of the lift, waiting for a pole to show up so you can step on it (pushing it backwards) and be pulled and rolled up the hill. It’s kind of like a ski lift on a bunny hill.

The article I referenced indicates that hills are a problem for Vélib, the bike-sharing system that opened in Paris this summer. Many bikes are abandoned or returned to stations at the bottom of hills: bike renters didn’t want to pedal up and walked instead. Install some bike lifts on some strategic hills in the city and this problem could go away. This issue also presents problems for the system’s basic workings: there must be an equal distribution and flow of bikes being returned to their stations. In these cases, maintenance vans working for the bike-sharing system operator must pick up bikes overflowing at one station and drop them off at stations missing bikes – namely the stations at the tops of hills.

Technorati Tags: , , , ,